• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • The Famous Blog
    • Blogging
    • Social Media
    • SEO
    • Marketing
    • Design

Famous Bloggers

How To Blog and Start a Business

  • Contribute
    • Submit News
  • Login

Home » The Famous Blog » What Does George Bush Have To Say About Power of Link Building

What Does George Bush Have To Say About Power of Link Building

December 6, 2010 - Last Modified: December 9, 2010 by Ana Hoffman

Power Of Link Building

What do you do to dominate Google? Google ranking algorithm was largely constructed around links. Essentially, that’s the way they come up with PageRank as well: how many links and the quality of those links determines your site authority.

What is a link?

A link is simply a way for a website to point to another website. Whenever you see that blue text that says “click here” or whatever and you click it and it takes you to another site is a link.

Essentially, the more links you get, the more Google will love you.

I am not saying that links is ALL you need in Google’s eyes; they do claim about 200 different factors go into their algorithm.

However, WITHOUT links you will simply not be able to achieve and maintain strong authority and high rankings.

So, it’s really simple: the more links you get and the better quality they are, the better your rankings are going to be.

BIGGEST QUANTITY of HIGHEST QUALITY LINKS = HIGHEST SEARCH ENGINE RANKINGS

Now it’s very important that those links are one way links.

Let me give you an example of the power of links.

This happened around 2004. A group of SEOs decided to rank George Bush’s White House page for the term “miserable failure”.

So what they did was built a good number of one way links with “miserable failure” as their anchor text pointing back to George Bush’s profile.

The result was both shocking and laughable: for a long time when you typed up “miserable failure” into a search, you would see Bush’s profile as the number one result.

It goes without saying, that nothing on his page ever mentioned “miserable failure”. So by the power of the incoming links alone, Google determined the search term relevancy to the former president’s profile.

Side note: a couple of years after the incident, Google finally changed its algorithm, making it far more difficult for such pranks to happen in the future. More on this at SearchEngineLand.com.

Bush before after
Bush before after

Now, when Obama took over the presidency, he basically dismantled the entire site to avoid his predecesor’s bad fame.

Results?

You tell me. I took the screen shot below on November 17 in Yahoo! Search.

bush yahoo miserable failure
bush yahoo - miserable failure

Ahh, the everlasting power of quality one way link building!


Love it or hate it? Comment to show me that you’re alive!

ana hoffman seo link buildingana hoffman yournetbiz

(post image credit)

ShareTweet

Filed Under: SEO

About Ana Hoffman

Follow @AnaTrafficCafe

Traffic, traffic, traffic... Can't do without it, but don't know how to get it? Ana does, and she freely shares her best advice on how to increase web traffic on her Traffic Generation Cafe blog. And don't forget to pick up Ana's 7 Steps to Complete Search Engine Domination free SEO report while you are at it - stop hoping for more search engine traffic and go get it!

Reader Interactions

Related Posts

  • Google Mobile SearchImpact of Recent Google Mobile-Friendly Algorithm on Non-Friendlier Websites
  • How to Work Simple But Tap Into Advanced Link Building Strategies
  • Things You MUST Know About Content Marketing
  • Will Classical Link Building Techniques be on the way out in 2013?

{ 73 Responses }

  1. Claire says:
    I think that prank made it harder for webmasters in general to rank high for certain keywords since the technique used does not hold much power as before.
  2. Lucian says:
    I think it is better that google focuses more on the content on the page, but probably it works more like a filter.
    • Ana says:
      Hi Lucian, That is actually better, but I think that will not happen soon. Ana
  3. Leo says:
    The french president was also "victim" of GoogleBombing, for keywords a lot worse that "Miserable Failure" - if you searched for "trou du c*l du web" (meaning "web's arsh*le"), his site came first, then his facebook page. His son was also the target of one for "fils à papa" - "daddy's son" pejoratively.
    • Ana says:
      Thanks for the info Leo. I actually didn't know that. Glad you came by, Ana
  4. Aakash says:
    Though miserable failure is really burning demo of the link building but the way you describe it is really good one. Many new bie will be able to learn from it. Note - Love your blog and thanks for providing those great tips.
    • Ana says:
      Hello Aakash, Thanks for the comment. Nice to have you here. Have a nice day, Ana
  5. Pritam says:
    Yes, this is really interesting fact that Google even does not care about the on page SEO if the off-page is very powerful. I have come up with search results many times in my R&D and concluded if you get the powerful backlinks for particular keywords, you can rank well even if you have not written that keyword in your page.
    • Ana says:
      Yes you are right Pritam. That can really happen in Google. Ana
  6. Tinh says:
    Interesting article and I love the image of Mr. Bush too :-)
    • Ana says:
      Thanks Tinh, I'm glad you like it. Have a nice day, Ana
  7. TJ McDowell says:
    Isn't there a way to say that you don't want to rank for a certain term? If there's not a tag for that, it would probably make sense to add one. Well, maybe not - then the pranksters would have moved on to different terms. Also had a question for you on your search results screenshot. Are you using a plugin to show the page rank of the pages in your yahoo search results? What plugin is that? Firefox? That would be pretty useful.
  8. Alex says:
    I mentioned this in some other comments I wrote for other articles, that google is very 'impressed' with one way linking, too impressed in my opinion. I also knew about the Bush prank. The first time I heard about it I didn't really know what to think about it (from a SEO point of view), but as time went by I started to understand. Oh, btw as far as I know, the webmasters that did this had several high autorithy website and with the help of those website they managed to pull this off, (as a response to the comment above me :)
    • Ana says:
      Hello Alex, Thanks for sharing your own idea and opinion about Google and on this topic and also about the webmasters. I actually didn't know that. Regards, Ana
  9. Andreas says:
    The problem is practically 'nobody' uses yahoo (statistically speaking) because of google's monopoly, so why should they work on their algorithms, doesn't matter much anyway.
    • Ana says:
      Hi Andreas, Nice to see you again. You are right on that. Thanks for the comment, Ana
  10. Andy says:
    Goes against everything Google have said about GoogleBombing not working, but it always brings a smile to my face when I see Dubya getting a search engine shoeing.
    • Ana says:
      Hello Andy, Nice to see you around. Thanks for the comment. Regards, Ana
  11. Charles says:
    Well, who would have thought George W. Bush would have been part of something educational for bloggers. LOL. Poor guy. I wonder if he knows what links and linkbacks are? I try to put links in my articles to things I feel are worth looking into but I have seen sites that put links on so many words on their pages that it actually becomes annoying after a while. But I will take this into consideration when writing my articles.
    • Charles says:
      Hah, forgot to change the website at the bottom of my reply. That is definitely not my recently posted article.
      • Ana says:
        Hi Charles, You are probably right, I think he's not aware of that. Anyway I'm glad you learned something from my post. All the best, Ana
  12. Susan says:
    HA! I had never heard that story about G. W. and the miserable failure before (although I had my opinion). What's google working on these days? If backlinks won't be that important what will? I noticed PR hasn't been updated since April.
  13. Alex says:
    That was amazing!! You used some great screenshots to illustrate your examples Ana! Who needs any more evidence that quality backlinking works! Hopefully, if will work to our advantage! I definitely wouldn't want my name (or business names) on top of search results for "bad" keywords!
    • Ana says:
      Hi ALex, Yes me too, it's bad publicity and I don't want to be part of that either. Thanks for coming, Ana
  14. Kareensolia says:
    wkwkwk...... funny stuff... But it is true that Bush is a miserable failure.Even without the power of the SEO I think it would still rank in top 10 for that keyword...
    • Ana says:
      Hello Kareensolia, I think many might share your opinion. Thanks for reading my post. Take care, Ana
    • Lucian says:
      Even if there were no anchor links with miserable failure, if people linked to his profile on pages where they described him as being a miserable failure could have still make it to the first page. But the link is required and i bet most people angry about his management would not post links to his profile.
  15. Karan says:
    Interesting stuff here, but I think Google will be dominating the web at least for the next decade as it still holds a large proportion of authority. Moreover, the rate at which Google is developing is overwhelming and it would be really tough for any other company to overtake it.
    • Ana says:
      Yes, you are definitely right Karan. I also think they will continue to rule for quite some time. Thanks for the comment, Ana
      • Aakash says:
        Anna I like the title which you used. Really impressive.
        • Ana says:
          Thanks Aakash. Ana
  16. Patricia says:
    Hi ana Interesting post. Just from reading the comments I see that everyone has their own opinion. Just goes to show Google is still king cos they have got everyone still guessing lol Patricia Perth Australia
    • Ana says:
      Hi Patricia, Glad to see you again. Everyone indeed has different opinion on this matter but we can't deny the fact the Google is still number one. Regards, Ana
      • Aakash says:
        No Google have learned from its mistake and they have rectified it. That is really good and impressive for a normal internet users because with that they will get the results what they are looking for.
  17. Lennart Heleander says:
    Hi Ana, Yes, strong links is important and I was over and read you blog post http://www.trafficgenerationcafe.com/one-way-link-building/ , really interesting and I found many new tips I didn’t know about. Thanks.
    • Ana says:
      Hello Lennart, Thanks for taking time to visit my site. I hope you will be able to use the tips and ideas from there. Have a nice day, Ana
  18. Henway says:
    It's a shame Google did a handjob and had to take that result out... Google always says Do no evil, but to me they are the ones that are evil.. always censoring stuff...
  19. Kevin Martineau says:
    Hi Ana, Wow! Great example of how this works. Thanks for the very helpful information. Kevin
    • Ana says:
      Hello Kevin, You're welcome. Thanks for stopping by Regards, Ana
  20. mark says:
    Hi Ana, This might have the funniest blog post title of the year. Plus, this is a great illustration of what a few people when they have some hours to kill. I remember this, though it was long before I understood back-linking, keywords, or much else related to blogging/IM. Hilarious.
    • Ana says:
      Hi Mark, Thanks for the comment. Yes you're right in saying that maybe they don't have anything to do with their time or maybe they just want to prove something. Have a great day, Ana
  21. Jarret says:
    Ana, the famous George Bush Google bomb was quite the SEO demonstration a few years back, for sure! Oddly enough, I imagine it wasn't that difficult back then particularly because of the strength of the dot gov domain. I don't think Google bombs are possible any more if all of the words are not found in content on the page. I've read SEO experiments and it's not even possible to rank on meta descriptions alone either if the desired ranking term isn't included in the post title tag or content.
    • Ana says:
      Hi Jarret, Thanks for sharing your own opinion on this topic. I appreciate it. Regards, Ana
  22. Drew says:
    Soon Google will phase this out when they work out how they can without affecting search quality, at least I hope they will. I think it's worth adding that the link building should be keyworded anchor text links, but then again, if you build a proper site, link building is unnecessary ;-)
    • Ana says:
      Thanks for sharing your thoughts Drew. I got your point but I still believe in the importance of link building to promote your sight. Ana
    • Lucian says:
      I don't think all the algorithm should be based on the page content. This will make people to overuse keywords and content on pages and it will be much easier to cheat the system. With a link oriented algorithm, let's say we are 2 competitors, you are trying to get the most links you can from your frineds websites, from blogs, links brokerage and you may end up higher than me for a specific keyword, but my quality and relevant content gets a reference from a very popuar website and i get in front again. This is what google want, to put higher reuslts that get referenced by trusted websites.
  23. Caleb says:
    I sometimes see sites with high PR yet low backlinks(under50) while at the same time other sites have low PR with high backlinks. For example the post author's own blog is showing like 82 Google BL's with zero PR :?: ..now I know some might say it's the quality of those BL's, but c'mon you all can't tell me you aren't noticing some serious inconsistencies :roll:
    • Steve says:
      Google hasn't done a "public" updating of backlinks since 2apr2010 so that is why what is seen for PR can be so skewed these days. There may even be getting away from PR entirely...who knows though, If Google told you they would have to kill you.
  24. Dennis Edell says:
    That's exactly how a totally undeserved famous blogger also came to power...a very unwise move.
    • Caleb says:
      Could you please expound on this :?:
      • Dennis Edell says:
        If you're asking for a name, no. There are but a few "thought to be" super-power bloggers today. One of them became what they are due to what can only be described as a very unethical link campaign w/anchor text.
  25. Barbara Ling, Virtual Coach says:
    What works today will be dead tomorrow...or next week, or next month, or what have you. I remember the google bombing stuff a few years ago...interesting that it still has that effect. You definitely want quality inbound links!
    • Caleb says:
      And now there's rumors that Google may be disbanding the whole page ranking system all together!
      • Tia says:
        Yeah, I wonder if that is true or not. There has been a major page rank update since April 2010. The thing is that Google can't just "decide not to" have the page rank system now. Too late. Almost every advertiser uses it to determine quality of sites for placing ads. It's a bit of a messy situation. It's like, once you publish an encyclopedia, you can't take it back. They should have thought about it before making it such a big deal.
    • Ana says:
      Hi Barbara, Things might change really fast. Quality inbound links is indeed important for. Have a nice day, Ana
    • Lucian says:
      The idea is that you should provide quality, a non-related link or a spinned article is just no quality, if you provide quality it will work forever.
  26. SmartAboutThings says:
    oh, c'mon, leave that poor guy alone :D
  27. Daniel Sharkov says:
    Hey Ana, So what it turns out is that nothing comes close to the importance of backlinks. If you really want to get on the top of SERPs for a specific keyword/keyphrase all the on-page SEO steps can't help you if the links pointing to your site are low quality. The example with the prank on Bush is an absolute proof to this. Great work!
    • Ana says:
      Hello Daniel, Well said. It might be a prank but they we're able to prove something. Thanks for coming, Ana
  28. Tom says:
    haha! That's what happens when bloggers unite :) I still think this could work, but the lasting effect may not be there.
    • Caleb says:
      Ditto ;)
    • Ana says:
      Hello Tom, What they did can really be funny but they we're able to do it succesfully. Thanks for coming, Ana
  29. Justin Germino says:
    It is true about how Google ranks SERP that with caffeine, google preview and more I would be surprised if Google doesn't scan the page being linked to to determine if they keywords matching it should even be ranked. I mean if the keywords are nowhere to be found in the HTML text of a page, META TITLE, META Description or anywhere, why would Google rank it high in the SERP just because many external sites linked there with a "keyword". Good information though, this all happened before I even started a blog and I didn't know anything about the miserable failure thing.
    • Ana says:
      Good point Justin. Thanks for sharing you opinion on this topic. Carry on, Ana
  30. Dave Lucas says:
    Nice article, but moot point - Google is totally re-arranging the way it ranks pages, so your good advice could be fatally flawed by the time this posts! (Then again, knowing Google, it may not!)
  31. Mani Viswanathan says:
    haha..the SEO's therein took full advantage. But they must have promoted that link with the anchor text in excess :P
    • Caleb says:
      These things make a hard case for what's considered "blackhat" vs "whitehat"..
      • Ana says:
        Hello Caleb, You might be right on that. Thanks for reading my post, Ana
      • Mani Viswanathan says:
        You are bang on! It's kinda Indecisive. We need to look into both the aspects.
    • Ana says:
      Hello Mani, Thanks for stopping by. I think that's what they really did. Regards, Ana

Primary Sidebar

Our Newsletter

Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our blog.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Popular Articles

  1. Top 10 Sites Where You Can Get Paid to Write 115,649 views
  2. How to Get Targeted Twitter Followers Fast 92,036 views
  3. How to Set Half Rating Scale 1-5 (Poor to Excellent) by Words 86,704 views
  4. 66 Awesome Social Media Quotes 78,368 views
  5. 50 Traffic Sources You Should Milk Like Crazy 75,081 views
Schema Structured Data for wordPress
  • Blog
  • Contribute
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclosure Policy

Copyright ©2020 · FamousBloggers - All Rights Are Reserved · Powered by Genesis Framework

  • Login
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
Go to mobile version